Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Obama On Race In America

As I noted yesterday, Barack Obama has a problem he needed to address in the words of the pastor of his church, Jeremiah Wright. Today, he did a pretty good job of doing that:

And occasionally [black anger] finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright's sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.

Obama Race Speech: Read The Full Text

As a life-long atheist, I can't comment much on how segregated Christian churches are in this country, but given what's happened over the years in our communities, I have little doubt that they are. I do know that there's anger from all sides in this debate, some of it justified, some not. To not acknowledge that it's there or that it is somehow un-American is to not understand what it is to be American. Obama adds:

On one end of the spectrum, we've heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it's based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we've heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.

I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country - a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

As such, Reverend Wright's comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems - two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.

Obama Race Speech: Read The Full Text

Personally, I think that the terrorism threat is overstated, albeit a real one. The others things are problems that are likely to divide us further. One thing's for sure, and that is that incendiary rhetoric isn't helpful. I wish Obama's supporters would take that idea to heart.

Obama addresses his relationship with Pastor Wright here:

Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way

But the truth is, that isn't all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God's work here on Earth - by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.
...
And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions - the good and the bad - of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.

Obama Race Speech: Read The Full Text

How well this explanation works for other people remains to be seen, but it rings true to me. We do have imperfect lives, and we sometimes being part of a community means you accept the eccentricities of others. None of this explains to me how Obama plans to bring us all together, but then, I really wasn't expecting an answer.


In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don't feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience - as far as they're concerned, no one's handed them anything, they've built it from scratch. They've worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they're told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.

Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren't always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism.

Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze - a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns - this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding.

Obama Race Speech: Read The Full Text

Like I said, there's anger on all sides in this discussion. I also find his observations spot on - it's astonishing sometimes what some white people believe about the advantages and disadvantages of their own racial makeup. Sometimes, white people really are hurt by things like affirmative action, but on the whole it's nowhere near as much as they believe, and it's certainly counterbalanced by the disadvantages of being a racial minority here.

I'm not a supporter of Obama's. In fact, I'm still not sure I'd vote for him in the general election. Nevertheless, I think his speech is worth a read. On the subject of our race relations, it's a good description of what it's like to be an American in the early Twenty-First Century.

UPDATE: SusanUnPC at No Quarter points out something I'd neglected to point out because it's not germane to the subject of racism:

Obama LIED repeatedly in the weeks before today’s confession. Today, he said, “Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely …”

Obama told the Chicago Sun-Times on March 15, 2008, “But the sermons I’ve always hear were no different than the sermons you hear in many African-American churches. I had not heard him make such, what I consider to be objectionable remarks from the pulpit. Had I heard them while I was in church, I would have objected. Had that been the tenor of the church generally, I probably wouldn’t be a member of the church.”

On March 14, when CNN’s Anderson Cooper asked Obama if he ever heard from others about Rev. Wright’s controverisal remarks, Obama replied with a flat “No.”

What We’ve Noticed About the Speech

I think this truth ought to work against Obama. It's one of the reasons I have my doubts that this speech will help him very much. The speech is still an important glimpse into how race relations are working in this country. On that basis, I think it's worth serious thought.

UPDATE 2: Taylor Marsh posted a copy of Bill Clinton's speech marking the Million Man March. Ironic how similar the sentiments of these two speeches are, given the current tiff between Obama and Hillary Clinton over alleged racism.

UPDATE 3 (Mar. 19): Another interesting perspective on race and politics from a Hillary Clinton supporter (h/t democrat1 at TaylorMarsh.com).


4 comments:

Unknown said...

At the very least Obama has had a Mitt Romney moment. For a small minority this speech may have helped him; but like Multiple Choice Mitt I don't see how this speech helps him with those who are predisposed to not vote for him.

Look for all sorts of Rev. Wright 527 negative ads coming out if Obama gets the nod. Rev. Wright is the gift that keeps on giving for Republicans.

Cujo359 said...

Wright's not the only one, although as an "angry black man" he's certainly going to energize a certain portion of the Republican base. There's also the Rezko trial and its aftermath, plus William Ayers the former Weatherman who supported Obama, and the history of his first run for office against Alice Palmer.

There's also the never-ending gag line of his association with Mayor Daley.

I'm sure we'll be seeing all that and more.

Anonymous said...

I have to object to the way you minimize whites being hurt by affirmative action.

There are two types of whites: affluent ones who never really experience real affirmative action (or, if they do, they have other options), vs. lower income whites who find it very painful to be exempted from the safety net, educational opportunities, enrichment programs, antipoverty programs, etc.

It is a real sore point with a lot of working class that the affluent are the ones who volunteer the working class for AA, then minimize their pain.

As a matter of fact, I have experienced AA firsthand, and I have known others who have as well.

I could tell stories, but to tell just one is misleading; you don't get the full effect until you see the arc, the full story of what happens when you're suddenly a homeless single mother in a town that has tons of services for poor women - no whites need apply. Or what it's like to live in a school district where the elementary school is knife-fight violent, but nobody cares because everyone but you can choose to send your kid to the other school if you are the concerned parent type.

I also remember the disabled friend who was so proud to get a job - and then her new coworkers were vicious to her, because they thought she only got it because of affirmative action, and she couldn't take their anger so she quit.

Of course it is downright horrific to be unemployed and to have less qualified people hired over you.

And to be stuck going to the JC because State chose a less qualified candidate instead - that isn't life crippling, but it is a real loss.

No - Affirmative Action is EVIL. It is like a lottery that chooses which lucky few people will pay for the crimes of their race.

Affirmative action is like first being robbed and then being told you deserve it.

And by the way, it is a peculiarly demoralizing feeling, being told that you are less worthy as a citizen, because you are guilty of racial crime, guilt by association.

INJUSTICE IS NOT OKAY, not "even" for whites. I am not exaggerating when I say entire lives, entire life-arcs could have turned out qualitatively better if services had been based on need instead of doled out by race.

I am still angry just thinking back. It is nice that some whites don't need safety nets or access to opportunities. But none of you have the right to give away those things, on behalf of all white people. Isn't the whole point supposed to be that discrimination is hurtful?

Cujo359 said...

Read the words "on the whole" and understand what they mean. I wrote that there may be individuals hurt by such a thing. You can find plenty of individuals who were hurt by the sort of racism that affirmative action is designed to counter.

Given that most of the AA policies I've seen have been of the "tie breaker" variety, in which if the candidates are otherwise similarly qualified then preference is given to someone from a minority, I really don't have a problem with that. They're not "lotteries". They're tie breakers. People's own prejudices are what makes them "lotteries". The "lotteries" you're talking about disappeared in the Eighties.

I'm sorry that people were cruel to the woman you described. That happens to minority people whether there is AA or not. It's nothing to do with AA - it's about bigotry. If there wasn't AA, they'd have said she got the job because the bosses felt sorry for her. People are like that. Put the blame where it belongs.