Friday, March 14, 2008

Finally, A Win

Image credit: National Archives

Dust off that "goddamned piece of paper". It's not quite ready for the recycling bin:

The House just now approved a new FISA bill that denies retroactive immunity to lawbreaking telecoms and which refuses to grant most of the new powers for the President to spy on Americans without warrants. It passed comfortably, by a 213-197 margin

House Democrats reject telecom amnesty, warrantless surveillance

This means that the House and Senate will now have to resolve the differences between the two bills in committee, or the Senate will have to vote on the House bill. Assuming they really want to change FISA.

Kudos to Glenn Greenwald, Firedoglake, and everyone else who's been keeping after this. It's pretty clear that at least a few conservative Democrats changed their minds about whether immunity for the telecomms was a good idea. Whether it was the blogs themselves or all the voters they helped mobilize, that idea didn't come out of thin air, of that much I'm sure.

UPDATE: Forgot to provide a link to the roll call of the vote.


A Silver Lining

For once, the white girl the news is obsessed about isn't missing or dead. That's one last thing we can thank Eliot Spitzer for, I suppose. Reuters is positively gushing:

NEW YORK (Billboard) - Could Ashley Alexandra Dupre, the aspiring singer embroiled in the prostitution scandal that toppled New York governor Eliot Spitzer, have a music career?

Top talent scouts are weighing in on her chances after the 22-year-old racked up millions of MySpace views and launched much-sought-after new songs on priced-by-demand Web site AmieStreet.com since the Spitzer story broke.

Could woman in Spitzer scandal become a star?


Enjoy the break while you can.


Thursday, March 13, 2008

FISA Recap For Today

It looks like they'll be having the vote tomorrow. Earlier today, CNet wrote:

Update at 2:44 p.m. PDT: There's a new twist in the FISA schedule. Upon request from Republican Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) has agreed to convene a rare "secret" session, in which politicians meet behind closed doors on the House floor to debate the bill. (Republican leaders apparently requested the procedural move because they believe there are elements of the proposal that shouldn't be discussed in public.) A Hoyer aide said the hour-long session will likely begin around 8:30 p.m. EDT. As of press time, no final decision had been made on whether the bill vote will occur after the Thursday night meeting or on Friday.

Democrats plan last-minute FISA vote

Jane Hamsher added a couple hours later:

Per a Democratic aide:

I think Republicans are the dog that caught the car. They thought we would say no, and now they don't know what to do.

Kucinich wants to know what they're going to talk about in the secret session. Hoyer: "I can't tell you that because I don't know."

Kucinich says he will not be attending a secret session on principle.

Um, to say that Dave Obey doesn't think much of the value of a secret session would be something of an understatement.

FISA House Session on CSPAN — Open Thread

According to Politico, this is only the fifth secret session in the history of the House. It's not particularly apparent why they want a secret session, or why it's worth so much trouble:

"Mr. Blunt stated that members in the Minority believe they have information relevant to the debate on FISA that cannot be publicly discussed," Hoyer said. "The majority agreed to Mr. Blunt’s request so that the Members may hear this information in a secret session that will proceed for one hour."

A closed session would require at least three hours for security personnel to sweep the chamber for listening devices.

House to go into rare closed session

Considering the Bush Administration's record on secrecy, I wouldn't trust anything I heard in such a session, and apparently Kucinich doesn't, either.

I've checked the roll call list and there's no mention of the bill. So it looks like we go to sleep no more screwed than we were this morning.

If you haven't called or e-mailed your representative, please do so Friday morning.


Once More On FISA

Image credit: National Archives


I'm running out of titles. As I wrote before, this "goddamned piece of paper" needs our help. Once more, the bad version of the FISA "reform" act is being considered in Congress, this time in the House. The bill is now called HR3773, even though the earlier, good version of this bill was also given that number. In short, it's now a bad bill, and needs to be rejected unless telcomm immunity and "basket" warrants are removed from the bill via amendment.

So call or write your representatives. Tell them they won't lose support if they stand up for freedom. If you're not sure who that is, this site can identify your congresscritters if you give it your address or zip code.

UPDATE: To keep up with this issue today, I'd suggest watching Firedoglake. In particular, here's Christy Hardin Smith's article on why Republicans should be against it, too.


Wednesday, March 12, 2008

A Depressing Evening

A gray seagull on a gray day. Does it get more depressing than that? Image credit: Cujo359

For a while this evening, checking in at various political blogs was a pretty depressing endeavor. Some folks just don't know when to shut up and think, as Eli notes:

What the hell is wrong with these people??? How can anyone honestly believe that the world is just handed to minorities or women? Any preferential treatment at all (i.e., affirmative action) is far outweighed by the prejudices and disadvantages that it’s supposed to (ineffectually) counter. Can you really look me in the eye and tell me that if you were an unborn spirit floating in the void, and you wanted to be President Of The United States, or attain some other prestigious (okay, formerly prestigious) position, that your first choice would be to be born as a black man, or a woman who gets very publicly cheated on?

Black Privilege

You'd think that having a black person and a woman as the two leading candidates of one party would be a cause for optimism, and yet the reactions I'm seeing to it on the Democrats' part is positively depressing. Will a day go by without someone accusing someone of racism or sexism? Not bloody likely, it appears.

I understand Geraldine Ferraro's frustration. I don't understand why she said what she did, because she should have known better. Clearly, Obama has something going for him besides being black. He's shown himself to be good at politics. If he wasn't, he would not be a front runner. He's outlasted some accomplished opponents to get where he is. That's not all due to charm or favoritism from the news.

In fact, given the number of times folks in the news business have remarked on Obama's middle name and his supposed Muslim education, I'd say that he hasn't had it all his own way with the press, either.

I wrote about this back in January, when people were accusing John Edwards of being a racist and a sexist for no good reason. He could be both, of course, because he's a white man. He had an advisor named Mudcat and a supporter named Cooter. What more reason did anyone really need? I wish people would take a breath and think for a second, but with many folks, it's not happening. It's ironic that some of the same folks who were doing the accusing then wonder where all this stuff is coming from now.


Sunday, March 9, 2008

Yesterday At No Quarter

At his blog No Quarter, Larry Johnson writes:

Now we face terrorism. Since [1990?] less than 10,000 Americans have died in terrorist attacks around the world. Got that? Less than 10,000. No terrorist organization on the face of the earth has an air force, naval fleet, submarine fleet, or armed force capable of striking the United States with anything even approximating 10% of the Soviet capability in their hey day. No terrorist force on the face of the earth has a nuclear arsenal ready to be launched at a moments notice that would destroy all major U.S. cities.

So what in the hell is Michael Scheuer and other fear mongers doing? They are making shit up and using fear as a bludgeon to convince Americans that we should surrender our honor and lose our humanity. I believe terrorism is a threat. And I believe folks like Bin Laden, if left to their own devices would try to do us harm again and would not hesitate to use a nuclear weapon. But that fact does not justify torture. Our fear should not be used as an excuse to act like the tyrants that our nation fought during and after World War Two.

Terrorist Fear Mongering and Torture

I'm guessing about the 1990 date, obviously. It's certainly true that no more than that many have died in that time. In contrast, around 18,000 Americans die each year of inadequate health care, according to the American Medical Association (PDF). In 2005, approximately 113,000 Americans died due to accidental injuries such as automobile accidents, according to the National Safety Council. Similar numbers of Americans die due to the medical effects of cigarette smoking.

Yet we continue to treat terrorism as though it were a mortal danger to our country. It is, at worst, a problem. What's worse, it's a problem that requires cooperation and support from other countries. Blatantly advocating the use of torture is the last thing that will gain us such cooperation, and it is useless for obtaining reliable information (PDF - pg. 225). There may be no more obvious sign of how low we've sunk as a society than the open advocacy of torture that I see every time this question comes up. Stupidity and cruelty aren't a desirable combination, yet they are the traits we seem to be most eager to show the rest of the world these days.

It's long past time that we declare such talk for what it is.


Friday, March 7, 2008

More Bad SciFi

Fans of science fiction, particularly real science fiction, aren't likely to be impressed with the latest offering from Roland Emmerich:

For the wackiest portrayal of the Stone Age since The Flintstones, we have no hesitation in recommending 10,000 BC, an adventure that starts in an icy Pleistocene village and ends in a vast desert where an Egyptian civilization has magically taken form.

Windsor Star Review: 10,000 BC
Anyone who's seen the trailers for this thing shouldn't be surprised at the observations of the more thoughtful movie critics. Here's another one:

The new Roland Emmerich movie "10,000 B.C." can be recommended to those who have (1) never seen Mel Gibson's vastly superior "Apocalypto"; (2) never seen the matchless "Lord of the Rings" pictures; or (3) never seen a movie before in their lives. To call the film derivative would be to over-praise it. Much of the story and several key sequences - especially one set in a huge pyramid city swarming with slaves - are ripped straight out of the Gibson movie, while the stampeding mastodons and snowy New Zealand mountaintop panoramas (along with some sub-Howard Shore soundtrack symphonizing) will surely stir feelings of familiarity among Frodophiles.

'10,000 B.C.': Time Bomb, By Kurt Loder
Yes, I thought I'd seen that somewhere before - like on The Flintstones. Emmerich, as you may recall, was responsible for the stupid, but amusing, Independence Day. My guess is that this one will be just as stupid, but far less amusing:

Still, there are nanoseconds of accidental poetry, like the visible tear stains on Evolet's resting face. But then comes a moment of Mesolithic silliness, like a "Braveheart"-ish speech by D'Leh to his men, or a reference to snow as "white rain" or Omar Sharif's narration. And the less said about historical accuracy, the better.

'10,000 B.C.' quest for early flair is just too Neanderthal
Independence Day at least featured skilled and accomplished actors like Will Smith and Jeff Goldblum. Not so with this turkey:

While the plot might look good on paper, it falls flat on screen and turns out to be just another run-of-the-mill hero story. The end result was made worse by weak acting and poor dialogue across the board.

Watching [Steven] Strait is uninteresting and uninspiring; he may have the look of a hero, but lacks the emotions and speech.

Prehistoric epic gets trampled
Another critic observes:

While the CGI induces laughter and a little bit of confusion, purposeful attempts at humor fall flat. The dialogue, besides being trite, is randomly dotted with absurd guttural noises presumably aimed at mimicking the era’s speech. Especially insufferable is the young Baku, the bumbling comedic relief, whose antics fail to prompt anything but embarrassment and the odd awkward chuckle.

Despite Visuals, "10,000 B.C." Is An Epic Disappointment
I haven't seen this film, nor will I do so without being paid handsomely (very unlikely), or being threatened with bodily harm. The only reason I'm writing about this thing is that it just represents another example of Hollywood's attitude toward the genre. These days, if you want to see good science fiction, you should turn on your TV.

It's hard to remember the last film I saw that could genuinely be called "science fiction". I think it was Contact. It definitely was a long time ago. Ten thousand years ago, agricultural societies were just getting started. The old world of hunter-gathering humans was changing into the world we live in now. Considering how interesting and dangerous those times actually were, you'd think that someone could write an interesting tale about them that was featured a passably accurate setting. Instead, we're treated to colossally expensive tripe like this.


Wednesday, March 5, 2008

One Proud Puppy

[This is Zip, who was three months old when this image was taken. Image credit: PuppyDogWeb.com]

While I'm still in a sort of Internet-free zone this week, I had a chance to write a couple of articles, and I'm thankful for that. I didn't want to go back into hiding, though, without thanking a couple of folks for thoughtful gestures of support.

Several months ago, shoephone tagged me as a Thinking Blogger awardee. Of course, one of the obligations of accepting the award is to nominate five other blogs. Unfortunately, nearly everyone I could think of who deserved that award already had one, or they were just too big to bother giving something like that. Awards like that should really be for unrecognized blogs, shouldn't they? I'm still looking, I swear. Someday, there will be a list here.

A few days ago, Bustednuckles named me as an awardee for the E for Excellent award. Of course, this award requires that you name ten worthy blogs.

I'm getting farther behind all the time. But I'm not complaining.


From Pig Iron To Iron Pigs



Image credit: Composite image by Cujo359 (See Note)

Every once in a while, I travel back to the area where I grew up - the Lehigh Valley in eastern Pennsylvania. When I was growing up here, it was an industrial center. There was a Mack truck plant and a Western Electric plant in Allentown, and a huge steel mill in Bethlehem. Bethlehem Steel was the second-largest steel manufacturer in the world back then. Mack moved their plant south many years ago, and thanks to the incompetence of its management and the intransigence of its unions, the Bethlehem Steel plant is long abandoned.

In those days, the huge blast furnaces that sat along the Lehigh River, produced pig iron from the raw ore shipped in from all over the country. These furnaces, tended by hundreds of steelworkers, plant managers, and engineers, ran around the clock, stopping only for maintenance. They were hot, noisy, and dirty machines, but they produced a vital product in what was, at the time they were built, the most modern and efficient way. Unfortunately, after the Second World War the world's steel industry was largely destroyed outside of the U.S. Bethlehem and other U.S. steel companies became lazy and arrogant, refusing to invest in new technologies. When foreign countries like Japan and Korea rebuilt their steel industries, they used more modern equipment in them, and they gradually learned to make steel better and more cheaply than their American counterparts. By the late 1970s, Bethlehem Steel and its American competitors were a shadow of their former selves. The Wikipedia article on Bethlehem Steel contains a good history of its rise and fall. In addition, a book entitled Crisis In Bethlehem, by John Strohmeyer, is an excellent chronicle of this sad time in our industrial past.

What brought all this to mind was a visit I paid the other day to the new Lehigh Valley Stadium, which will be the home stadium for the Iron Pigs, the Philadelphia Phillies' AAA minor league team. Anyone who has looked into the recent history of minor league baseball can tell you that it is nearly as difficult for a city to hold onto a minor league team as it is a major league one:

We here in Emmaus and the rest of the Lehigh Valley are the direct beneficiaries of Ottawa's loss of the Lynx. Still, it should sadden any fan to know that AAA baseball no longer will be played in Canada starting next year.

AAA baseball, and International league ball in particular, has a proud history in Canada that should not have ended the way it did. Canadian teams have won a total of 18 AAA titles.

Eulogy: AAA ball in Canada

Like many minor league baseball teams, the Iron Pigs, formerly the Lynx, got a better offer, moved, and changed their name. Lehigh County, with the help of various grants, built a beautiful new stadium with a bigscreen TV, sky boxes, and other modern features for the team to lure them here. Apparently, Ottawa decided it couldn't compete. What's especially interesting is where one of those grants came from:

Minor league baseball will return to the City of Allentown Pa. in 2008, thanks in part to a grant from EPA's Revolving Loan Fund (RLF). The Philadelphia Phillies will move their Triple A team (just a notch below the majors) to a new stadium being built on the site of a former electronics plant. The 7,000-seat stadium, located between American Parkway and Union Boulevard in East Allentown, is expected to cost $34.3 million.

We see this project as a hub around which economic development will occur. It's a perfect re-use for a former industrial property because we're taking a good portion of land and turning it into greenspace, said Glenn Solt, Manager of Capitol Projects for Lehigh County.

...

The site was originally developed in the 1940s and operated by Western Electric, AT&T Microelectronics, Lucent Technologies and Agere systems until the facility was closed in 2003. The site was used for the manufacture of electronic components such as circuit boards and computer chips. The buildings were demolished in 2004.

A Phase I environmental assessment was completed in 2005 and subsequent Phase II assessment work was completed in early 2006. A subsurface soil investigation noted an approximately 30,000-square-foot area that contained some buried electronic parts and concentrations of chlorinated solvents, mercury, nickel and silver in the soil.

Brownfield of Dreams Becoming Allentown's Reality

Silver and nickel are typically found in circuit board solder, solvents are used to clean circuit boards and integrated circuits. All of this was buried beneath the ground where Lehigh Valley Stadium, which is now called Coca Cola Park thanks to an advertising contract, now stands.

The source of these contaminants is another example of the decline of this area's industrial base. The stadium is next door to, and on top of, what remains of the old Western Electric plant, which was once a part of AT & T, the telephone monopoly. Among other things, early research into semiconductor manufacturing was done there:

But the transistor was still a long way from becoming the mass-produced gizmo that would reshape—or create—huge industries, including radio, television, microelectronics, and aerospace. More than a decade of development—involving silicon purification, crystal growing, and the diffusion of chemical agents called dopants into semiconductors—was required before transistors could begin to assume the forms they are found in today. Much of that work took place not at Bell Labs but at two Western Electric plants in Pennsylvania, in Allentown and nearby Reading, where engineers developed the precision manufacturing processes and techniques needed to mass-produce transistors. The clean room, used today in almost every aspect of semiconductor manufacturing, was born and raised in Allentown.

The End of AT&T

Later, this plant produced the laser diodes that constituted the long links in the information superhighway. It employed hundreds of engineers, technicians, accountants, and other professionals, most of whom were well paid. When we drove past what was left of this facility on Monday, it was sporting the logo of LSI Corporation, and it had a parking lot that was almost empty. Much like the Bethlehem Steel plant, it is now too antiquated for most applications.

In a sense, these giant industries have been replaced by a small niche industry, albeit one that the local governments were happy to put up $34 million to obtain. What economic benefit is likely to accrue? The EPA estimates:

When the stadium opens in April 2008, it will have 30 full-time employees, as well as providing numerous part-time service jobs. It will also require trash hauling, food, cleaning services, advertising and printing in addition to other goods and services which will generate jobs and economic development in the area.

Brownfield of Dreams Becoming Allentown's Reality

Thirty jobs, mostly low-paid, replace thousands of high-paying jobs. This is the transition much of America is undergoing. Personally, I'd rather have the blast furnaces.

Note about the image: This is a composite of images from the Bethlehem Steel online site, and the Iron Pigs' stadium page.

UPDATE: There's no new content, but I've made several edits to clarify things. I also fixed the link to an explanation of laser diodes.

UPDATE (Mar. 24): If you're having trouble finding the Iron Pigs' schedule, I offer some advice on the subject.

Afterword (Aug., 2011): For those who landed here because they asked the online question "What is an iron pig?", or words to that effect, I think the most common answer is "a motorcycle police officer". An obscure minor league baseball team named after a failed American industrial sector is probably the second definition.

Glad I could help.


Not Too Surprising

Image credit: Pollster.com.

John McCain locked up the Republican nomination for President yesterday:

John McCain secured the Republican presidential nomination yesterday with a four-state sweep, getting a head start against the Democrats going into November's general election.

McCain's rival, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, 52, dropped out of the race after losing to the Arizona senator in Texas, Ohio, Vermont and Rhode Island.

McCain Clinches Republican Nomination After Sweep

No one who has even glanced at the news on that race could be too surprised. McCain's been ahead for a while now, and he's the choice of the Republican establishment. That he would be their choice this time would seem to suggest just how apprehensive they are about this election - McCain is one of the few candidates in that field who have any real support among independents. As the Washington Post observed:

The exit polls showed McCain with a clear advantage among moderates and independents across the board, while Huckabee -- a Baptist minister -- was tied or leading among evangelicals in several states. Self-described conservatives have shown more varied tastes, though Romney out-performed McCain in most states among that constituency, including Arizona. McCain scored solid victories with seniors and military veterans.

McCain Surging; Huckabee Strong In The South; Romney Winning in Rockies (Feb. 5, 2008)

[emphasis mine]

In the not-too distant past, they would have been revolted by a candidate who even gave lip service to deviating from the party line, which is about all McCain's actually managed to do in the past eight years. Now, they seem to think that if they have any chance at all, it will be with someone who appeals to the middle.

On the Democratic side, of course, things are a bit less settled:

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s victories in Ohio and Texas on Tuesday night not only shook off the vapors of impending defeat, but also showed that — in spite of his delegate lead — Senator Barack Obama was still losing to her in the big states.

In 2 Battlegrounds, Voters Say, Not Yet

The New York Times isn't quite right, though. Clinton's been strong in most states where there were primary elections, rather than caucuses. The latter have been Obama's turf. Clinton's also more popular among Democratic voters. Obama tends to win in primaries where voters of one party can vote for candidates of another. As usual in their coverage of this race, the press have overlooked the obvious.

Speaking of which, here's a bit of conventional wisdom that I could do without:

For Mrs. Clinton, the battle ahead is not so much against Mr. Obama as it is against a Democratic Party establishment that had once been ready to coalesce behind her but has been drifting toward Mr. Obama. The party wants a standard-bearer now to wage the war against the newly minted leader of the Republicans, Senator John McCain, who enjoys a head start with every day that the Democrats lack a nominee of their own.

In 2 Battlegrounds, Voters Say, Not Yet

Did the NYT think to check whether these party elders also happen to be Obama supporters? I bet they haven't. I've encountered this nonsense before, mainly from Obama supporters in this election cycle. Yet, when I've called them on it, they haven't been able to come up with a single example of how a long, drawn out primary fight was actually detrimental to the party's chances. There are at least a few examples of a where such a battle was followed by a defeat in the general election, but in all the cases I can think of, there were underlying difficulties that either precipitated those fights or were another symptom of the party's own difficulties. Yet this particular pearl of wisdom goes unchallenged in the news, and unexamined as well.

That the same geniuses who have lost nearly every Presidential election of the last 25 years cling to this nonsense, and the press is uninterested in checking it out, shouldn't be terribly surprising to anyone.

Meanwhile, I feel there's at least some hope that we won't have to choose between Obama an McCain for President, and that's something to be thankful for.

Pollster.com hasn't updated its polls in almost a week. I haven't been following the polls enough to know why. The graph in this article still shows Obama with a 6.9 point lead. It will be interesting to see what effect the last couple of weeks of debates and elections have had.