Showing posts with label stupid web pages. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stupid web pages. Show all posts

Friday, April 19, 2013

Infrastructure Issues

Blogger and Google have finally managed to screw their interface up to such an extent that I can no longer load image files into articles here. Until either I figure out how to get around that, or they figure how to fix it, I'll be referring any articles that require graphics to an alternate site at Wordpress. We'll see how long that's necessary.

Looks like it's my turn now. Last time Blogger screwed with the editor interface, they mostly messed with the visual editor, which I don't use. A few weeks ago, though, they changed the image upload interface so that it was no longer possible to tell it how to format an image file. I just started cutting and pasting the style information from other articles, so clearly that wasn't good enough for them. Now, they make you upload everything to Google Docs, and, naturally, introduced Javascript code that NoScript interprets as a cross-site script attack.

So, at least for now, I'll be blogging mostly at the Wordpress site, but linking to the articles from here. We'll see what the next move is.

Sunday, March 31, 2013

Google Is Watching

This is what greeted me when I tried to log into this blog from a remote location:

Creepy. I suppose I should be reassured that Google is making sure that I am who I say I am, and that my blogging job hasn't been taken over by a spam bot, but it isn't. It's also pretty clear that Google records where I log in from, and keeps that information at least a couple of weeks.

In a world where it's hard to avoid surveillance no matter where you are or what you're doing, this is not at all reassuring. I'm sure I'm just old fashioned, but moments like this give me an overwhelming urge to "anonymize".

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

Now I've Seen Everything: July 24, 2012 Edition

Here's some proof that there are people with way too much time on their hands:


Image credit: Dunno source

No, not the picture, actually. It's the place I found it, which apparently is a site scrape of Pharyngula, with various graphics of cats inserted. PZ Myers makes a point of being against anything feline, so apparently someone has decided to make his worst nightmare come true.

Even if the only work they put into this site is finding new graphics for the site, it's way more effort than I'd want to go to for a joke.

UPDATE: Apologies for not filling in the link. There's a time of night when I shouldn't try to publish anymore, but if I didn't disobey that rule there are weeks when I'd publish nothing at all.

Friday, April 6, 2012

Baseball Whiffs Online

I was almost tempted to buy Major League Baseball's Game Day service, until I read the fine print. The executive summary of the fine print is that, even though you're paying more than $100 to see baseball games on your computer, you won't be able to see the games your local team is playing. You won't be able to see the ones that conflict with the game of the week, either. Plus, there are some others you won't be able to see.

But that's not the best part of the MLB online experience, though. I went to check the schedule to see what might be available, and here's what the Philadelphia Phillies schedule looks like:


Image credit: Screenshots of MLB website pages by Cujo359

And here is the Seattle Mariners':


Of course, things have gotten worse since the last time I mentioned MLB's online presence. Now, not only can I usually not get to the GameDay page except by trial and error, but I can't read half the schedule.

And these guys think that I'm going to pay $110 or more for a season of this kind of online incompetence, on the off chance that there's a game on that I want to watch, that hasn't been blacked out.

Idiots.


Monday, November 14, 2011

Getting UnTwittered Just Got Easier

Think of it as the Internet's way of saying you need to get a life:

Image credit: Screenshot by Cujo359

In my case this is mildly annoying, because I need to embed a Twitter feed URL in a post I'm writing for someone. Hopefully, this long international nightmare will be over soon.


Sunday, September 18, 2011

Yet Another Blogspot Workaround

Blogspot recently decided to redo how an image is displayed when someone clicks on it to see the full size version. This used to work by displaying the picture by itself. I liked this just fine. I could middle-click on it and have it appear in a separate page, for instance.

Now, of course, they had to "improve" things by making the picture display over the page, instead of going to a new one. Try it, if you haven't, on this image:

Image credit: Cujo359

Yuck.

Anyway, it works on the new images, ones I've put into articles in the last few months. Earlier than that, though, they don't work. All you see is a red rectangle in the middle of the screen. Go to this article and click on a picture to see what I mean.

The workaround for this is to disable Javascript. If you have the NoScript extension in Firefox, just disable the blogspot.com domain. If you don't have NoScript, just disable Javascript globally, and you should be able to see the picture in the next page just like before.

Sometimes, middle-clicking on the picture works, too, at least if you're using a POSIX system like Linux or BSD Unix.

Someday, I'm sure this will be fixed, but for now, that's a workaround. Sorry for the inconvenience.


Monday, June 27, 2011

On Links

I re-enabled the "Links To This Article" feature the other day to see if it has been fixed. I think it is now safe to say it hasn't.

The links that people have actually made to my site do not appear, or they only appear for a little while, then disappear. What remains, sometimes, is a long list of completely unrelated links from blogs that "follow" this one. For one article that I wrote a few days ago, there were almost two dozen supposed link backs, some dating from 2008.

Of course, I've left word in the "support" forums, with no acknowledgement or interest expressed by Blogspot. Several other people have reported this problem, with similar results.

I think it's safe to say this feature isn't going to be fixed anytime soon. So I've turned it off. Again.

So, please, if you write something that links back to an article of mine, and your site isn't on the blogroll (in other words, yours isn't a blog I read regularly), then either drop me a line or leave a comment if you want me to notice. I promise I'll see that either way.


Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Free Advice

Here's some free advice to website designers:

If you're going to define the color of your website's background, define the default text color, as well.

Now, free advice is often worth what you pay for it, but in this case, I'll offer an example why I say this, and how to fix it. Here's how a page at Firedoglake looks on my computer screen at the moment:

Image credit: Screenshot of FireDogLake page by Cujo359

See how the text of my comment is washed out? That's because I'm using a reversed desktop color theme for on my computer. People who have a bright screen with limited contrast sometimes like to do this. Unfortunately, it makes the default text color a very light gray or white. Not good if someone defines the background color on a website to be white, but doesn't bother to define the default text color. This is just bad programming technique, as far as I'm concerned. What this practice does is define the background color at the website, but leave the choice of text color up to the visitor's web browser.

To fix this, I downloaded that FDL page, and changed Cascaded Style Sheet style_003.css from this:
Firedoglake Ajax Commenting Theme
*/ /* Tags */
body {
        font: normal 13px Arial;
        background: #F2F1EC;
}
To this:
Firedoglake Ajax Commenting Theme
*/ /* Tags */
body {
        font: normal 13px Arial;
        background: #F2F1EC;
        color: black;
}
With the result that the page now looks like this:

(And no, the blue lines didn't disappear because of the change I made. That's to do with the difference between the downloaded page and the one loaded from the website.)

Just to short-circuit some return free advice:
  • Yes, I know I can tell my browser to use its own colors, rather than the website's. This is almost invariably a bad idea.
  • Yes, I know that I can tell my browser to use a different default text color (like black), instead of the desktop theme's. Firefox doesn't do this properly, though.

I like the look of a reverse desktop color theme, and I wish I could use it as the default in my web browser. Plus, as I said, not defining one thing while defining the other is bad practice. Letting one bit of software determine one part of the look of one's website, and another, completely different bit of software determine the rest, is also an invariably bad idea.


Thursday, May 26, 2011

Obscure Blogger Feature Of The Day

How do you get to your blogging dashboard in Blogger? The way I've been doing it these last few years was to click on "New Post", then click on the "Dashboard" link when the new article form came up. It turns out there's an easier way:

Image credit: Screenshot and alterations by Cujo359

Just click on the little Blogger logo, helpfully pointed out by the big, crude black arrow, and you will either be taken to:
  • The login screen, if you're not logged in
  • The dashboard, if you are
Once you know the secret, of course, it's easy.

How long have I been doing this, four years? Eventually I'll get the hang of it, I suppose.

Anyway, I pass this on in the hopes that it will save someone else years of extra effort.


Wednesday, December 8, 2010

We At Tango Uniform Internet Apologize ...

I've been seeing this quite often at Robert Reich's Blog, as well as other places:
Image credit: Screenshot by Cujo359

I don't know what's up with this, since I don't know who Reich and those other blogs use as their provider. They may want to consider changing providers, if this continues.

Anyway, apologies to anyone who was trying to get to the article I was quoting earlier. It really is there, somewhere, I promise.

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Another Stupid Web Page

Caption: The "legacy" version of Five Thirty-Eight. Nowadays, you land there, start to read, and then kawoosh!, you're on Planet Sulzberger.

Image credit: Screenshot of a Five Thirty-Eight page by Cujo359

As readers may or may not be aware, the site Five Thirty-Eight was recently moved to new digs at The New York Times. That's all well and good; there is such a thing as progress, after all, and such a thing as getting paid for all the work you do. At least, I've heard that happens sometimes. So I don't blame the 538 crew for moving on.

However, that doesn't stop me from being annoyed at the condition they've left the old site in. Try to go to a link at the old site, say this one. See what happens? After a delay that's just long enough to fool you into thinking it's worth starting to read the article, it takes you to the front page of the NYT site. Not to the version of that article that's on the new site.

That's just what happened to me when I followed a link from this article I finally had to save the page to my hard disk, edit out the refresh command, and then load it from there.

What moron thought that was a good idea? It's so stupid that Five Thirty-Eight now deserves its own special mention as a Stupid Web Page. Congratulations.


Tuesday, October 13, 2009

The Return of Stupid Web Pages

We haven't had an installment of "Stupid Web Pages" in quite a while. Today, the Republican National Committee, with the launch of their new GOP.com website, has provided us with an opportunity. Here's what their front page looks like without JavaScript turned on:

Here's a question you can't answer from this graphic, assuming you can't read the small print at the top, Where am I?

If there's one thing we've learned today, it's that the first thing any politician will make sure is functional is the DONATE button.

Like most first timers, I'm sure the GOP hired their idiot nephews to run the site. Eventually, they'll figure out that you really have to hire professionals. Speaking of which, here's what you see if you happen to get to their "Future GOP Leaders" page, according to Talking Points Memo:

This, at least, is truth in advertising.

UPDATE: Via Steve Benen, here's Marc Ambinder's list of reasons why GOP.com sucks:

10. In a section devoted to "future leaders," there were none.

9. In the subsequent rush to get up a "future leaders" page, they choose "you."

8. The last GOP accomplishment cited on the accomplishment page was from 2004.

7. The what's up page -- hip! starts with this sentence: "the internet has been around for a while now"

6. Administrator passwords were accidentally posted.

5. When the RNC hosted a kick-off conference call, the website was down.

4. The website cites Jackie Robinson as a GOP hero. Robinson wasn't a GOPer, and he criticized the GOP on race.

3. The first question on the conference call was from an Hispanic Republican who asked why the GOP site didn't have a Spanish-language page and noted that the White House had one.

2. Bragging about web redesigns is so 2004.

1. It's not timed with the start of any major advocacy campaign -- or political campaign. And it portrays itself as something it's not: diverse and ready to embrace new ideas. That may be what the party leadership aspires to, but, at least when it comes to diversity, a few pictures of Hispanics and African Americans doesn't make up for ... well, the history of the party.

Top Ten Reasons Why The GOP Website Relaunch Is Fizzlin'

I think nothing more needs to be said.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Blogspot Is Broken Today

I'm going to start a new category of posts called "stupid web pages". Blogspot will figure prominently in them today. Let me start at the beginning.

For some reason, Blogger's preferred image server, Picasa is down at the moment. No word on why or how. If you try to click on one of the missing pictures, you're sent to a page that asks you to report the problem if it persists. Clicking on that link sends you to a page that has no links that allow you to report something. You can only click on various help topics. Does any of this sound smart so far?

My guess is that it will be hours before anyone responsible is even aware that there's a problem.

Needless to say, I have no idea how to fix this or report it, save by writing a post that, hopefully, someone from Blogspot will read. Meanwhile, sorry about the lack of images.

And to the "commenter" named "Jackpot", don't expect Blogspot's lack of helpfulness to be an impediment to getting rid of you for too much longer. If you continue to post spam comments here, I'll figure out a suitable way to deal with them beyond just deleting them. I'll probably start posting your IP addresses here, and any other helpful information.

UPDATE: It appears that Blogspot and Picasa are now working. I don't think this article had anything to do with it.